SEMrush vs Moz Pro. Competition 2 SEO Tools. Which Tokositus Chooses?
Are Moz or SEMrush keyword tools more accurate?
Tokowebsite works with many online businesses to improve their rankings. Day after day, Tokositus must use the best tools to get the job done. That’s when we ran into the issue of which tool is better, SEMrush vs Moz Pro.
These two tools are the most respected and recognized online tools in the SEO world. Both are pretty comprehensive in what they can do, but since their many features come together, we had to decide which one to use.
It was a tough decision because both tools have so much to offer, but we decided on SEMrush. The following article will provide an honest comparison on each of the main features of an SEO tool.
We are not sponsored by any of the companies so this is a transparent comparison and review of SEO tools, plus an explanation of why we made the decisions we did.
SEMrush Keyword vs Moz Keyword Explorer Review
Our SEMrush keyword research tool is called the Steady Keyword Tool.
These two keyword tools provide hundreds of suggestions on keywords to target, such as Moz’s. But it was clearly built starting with a PPC (Pay Per-Click) perspective. For example, these tools will generate keyword ideas based on keywords that Sitestore input and SiteStore can filter by broad match, phrase match, or exact word match, word count, statement or question, words starting with, words ending, keywords it contains, keywords it doesn’t contain, or word difficulty.
Surprisingly, this is actually an advantage because those filter options are quite useful and other tools don’t usually offer these filters.
Moz’s tool, called Keyword Explorer, is just as powerful. This will give you several hundred keyword ideas based on the initial phrase you typed.
Moz’s filtering is arguably more powerful, as it allows Tokosituss to sort by several innovative methods, including “related keywords with similar search results”, “closely related topics”, “widely related topics”, “only include keywords with all terms query ”, and “mix of sources”.
The only drawback that only constant use will find is that this tool (Moz) is not always accurate. Such creative filtering options require a qualitative algorithm and that’s hard to get right.
Moz, in filtering by similar search results, for example, seems like a preferred and unique way to find SEO keyword ideas, but the results that come up are often less than ideal. The site shop gets related terms that are not always relevant.
Both of these tools are roughly suitable for this area (filter by search results). Moz has the slight advantage of being able to replace inaccurate filters with search volume accuracy.
Google’s Keyword Planner tool does the trick by aggregating the average searches per month of closely related search phrases, synonyms, and plurals and singulars. The problem is failing to pick up search volume on keywords that have little volume (10 per month is usually the threshold at which this inaccuracy occurs) or exaggerating by lumping too many things together.
Moz Pro displays its own unique search volume for each keyword, clearly separating each related keyword into its own search volume for more accurate images. The siteshop pegs Moz’s search volume slightly more accurately than SEMrush.